I’m Still Here: A Family’s Resilience Against Brazil’s Dark Past

Estimated read time 6 min read

I’m Still Here is a true story about Eunice Paiva, a Brazilian human rights lawyer whose life was shattered by the disappearance of her husband, Rubens, during the military dictatorship in 1971. The film, adapted from Marcelo Paiva’s memoir, follows Eunice’s decades-long fight for truth and justice. Despite her Alzheimer’s diagnosis, Eunice’s determination and strength inspire her family and the nation. The film has become a global phenomenon, winning awards and sparking conversations about Brazil’s past and present. It is a powerful tribute to Eunice’s legacy and a reflection of the country’s ongoing struggle for democracy.

I’m Still Here: A Family’s Journey Through Brazil’s Dark Past
In the heart of Rio de Janeiro, a family’s idyllic life was brutally interrupted by the military dictatorship that gripped Brazil in the early 1970s. The story of Eunice Paiva, a human rights lawyer, and her family is one of resilience and determination in the face of injustice. This true story, adapted into the critically acclaimed film “I’m Still Here,” is a testament to the enduring power of love and the human spirit.

Eunice’s husband, Rubens Paiva, was a former congressman and engineer who was arrested by military police on January 20, 1971. His disappearance was a devastating blow to the family, and Eunice’s life was forever changed. Despite the military regime’s efforts to silence her, Eunice continued to fight for the truth about her husband’s disappearance. Her journey took her through decades of struggle, from the initial arrest to the eventual confirmation of Rubens’ death in 2014.
The film, directed by Walter Salles, is a poignant portrayal of Eunice’s life. It jumps between the early 1970s, when the family’s joy was shattered by Rubens’ disappearance, and the 1990s and 2010s, when Eunice’s fight for justice continued. The film won the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama for Fernanda Torres, who played Eunice. It is also widely predicted to be nominated for Best International Feature Film at the 97th Academy Awards.
“I’m Still Here” is more than just a family’s story; it is a reflection of Brazil’s dark past and its ongoing struggle for democracy. The film highlights the brutal tactics of the military dictatorship, which included torture and forced disappearances. The National Truth Commission, launched by former president Dilma Rousseff, played a crucial role in uncovering the truth about Rubens’ disappearance and the regime’s atrocities.
The film’s release coincided with significant events in Brazil, including major revelations about the military regime’s crimes. This timing added urgency to the story, making it a powerful tool for confronting the country’s past. As Marcelo Paiva, Eunice’s son, noted, “I realized that my mother was losing her memory while Brazil was discussing its own memory. It was a very weird parallel and paradox to write about.”
The film also explores the concept of “o homem cordial” (the cordial man), coined by Brazilian sociologist Sérgio Buarque de Holanda. This concept highlights the friendly and open nature of Brazilians, who often deal with serious issues in a private manner. However, “I’m Still Here” shows that even in the face of such private struggles, the need for public acknowledgment and justice is crucial.
In conclusion, “I’m Still Here” is a film that not only honors the legacy of Eunice Paiva but also serves as a reminder of the importance of confronting and learning from one’s past. It is a testament to the human spirit’s ability to endure and fight for justice, even in the darkest of times.


  1. What was Rubens Paiva’s role in Brazilian politics?
    Rubens Paiva was a former congressman and engineer who was involved in leftist guerrilla groups resisting the military dictatorship.
  2. How did the military dictatorship affect Eunice Paiva’s life?
    The military dictatorship led to the arrest and disappearance of Rubens Paiva, causing Eunice immense emotional and psychological distress.
  3. What was the significance of the National Truth Commission in uncovering the truth about Rubens’ disappearance?
    The National Truth Commission, launched by former president Dilma Rousseff, investigated crimes against humanity committed during the dictatorship and confirmed Rubens Paiva as one of 434 people killed or disappeared by the military regime.

  4. How did Eunice Paiva cope with the loss of her husband and the subsequent years of uncertainty?
    Eunice continued to fight for the truth about her husband’s disappearance, selling the family home and moving to Sao Paulo to care for her children while maintaining her determination to find out what happened to Rubens.

  5. What role did Fernanda Torres play in the film adaptation of “I’m Still Here”?
    Fernanda Torres played Eunice Paiva in the film, winning the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama.

  6. How did the film’s release coincide with major events in Brazil?
    The film’s release coincided with significant revelations about the military regime’s crimes, adding urgency to the story and sparking conversations about Brazil’s past and present.

  7. What is the concept of “o homem cordial” and how is it relevant to the film?
    “O homem cordial” refers to the friendly and open nature of Brazilians, who often deal with serious issues in a private manner. The film highlights this concept by showing how Eunice’s family struggled with their private pain while also seeking public acknowledgment and justice.

  8. What impact has “I’m Still Here” had on Brazilian society?
    The film has generated significant interest in Brazil, with over 3 million people watching it in cinemas and sparking discussions about the country’s dark past and its ongoing struggle for democracy.

  9. How does the film portray Eunice Paiva’s transformation from a private individual to a national hero?
    The film shows Eunice’s transformation from a private individual dealing with personal grief to a national hero who inspired her family and the nation with her determination and strength.

  10. What message do you think the filmmakers intended to convey through this story?
    The filmmakers aimed to convey the importance of confronting and learning from one’s past, as well as the enduring power of love and the human spirit in the face of injustice.


Conclusion:
“I’m Still Here” is a powerful and poignant film that not only honors the legacy of Eunice Paiva but also serves as a reminder of the importance of confronting and learning from one’s past. The film’s portrayal of Eunice’s journey from a private individual dealing with personal grief to a national hero who inspired her family and the nation is a testament to the enduring power of love and the human spirit. As Brazil continues to grapple with its dark past and its ongoing struggle for democracy, “I’m Still Here” stands as a significant contribution to this ongoing conversation, inspiring audiences worldwide to reflect on their own histories and the importance of seeking truth and justice.

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours